Documentary Facts ..... from the library of
Allamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi
Come, let us distinguish between friends and enemies, recognize between our own and the stranger, strengthen our ties with the true slaves of the Divine mercy, the beloved Prophet (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi WaSallam) and become one another defender and friend in the name of the same Prophet and with unity among us become like a lead-filled solid wall. You must believe Allaah Kareem's mercy and help will be with us at every moment. And greatness, honor, success and prosperity will be our destiny.
For it has been proclaimed, “Kee Muhammad Se Wafaa Tuune Tuo Ham Teray Hayn Yeh Jahaan Cheez Hai Keyaa Lauh-o-Qalam Teray Hayn” I Myself am yours if you are faithful to Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] What thing is this world, even the Tablet and the Pen will be yours Wa Sallal Laahu ‘Aalihi Habeebihi Saiy-yidina Muhammadin Wa Alaiehi Wa As haabhi Wa Baaraka Wa Sallama Ajma'een.... excerpt from the book Minaz-Zulumaati Ilan-Noor (From darkness into light) (Al-Qur’aan) Deoband to Bareilly (The Truth) By Allamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi .. |
Introduction WHY THE DIFFERENCES?..read on
References 1-11
References 11-20
References 20-40
Translation of Urdu Documentary Program "Aakhir Ikhtilaaf Kyuun" is presented here with References from Authentic Books .......
from the Personal Library of Allamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi.It is an humble attempt by the Maulana Okarvi Academy Al'alami to help spread the message of "Truth" for those readers who do not know Urdu. |
Bismil-Laahir-Rahmaa Nir- Raheem
As-Salaatu Was-Salaamu ‘Alaieka Yaa Rasoolal-Laah -As-Salaatu
Was-Salaamu Habeebal-Laah
Dear Viewers
As Salam o Alaikum! Wa Rahmatul Laahi Wa Barakaatuhu!
In the Qur’aan, e Paak, Soorah Baqraraah verse 8 Allaah
[Subhaanhu Wa Ta'aalaa] says:
The reason explained by Allaah Ta'aalaa is that:
As-Salaatu Was-Salaamu ‘Alaieka Yaa Rasoolal-Laah -As-Salaatu
Was-Salaamu Habeebal-Laah
Dear Viewers
As Salam o Alaikum! Wa Rahmatul Laahi Wa Barakaatuhu!
In the Qur’aan, e Paak, Soorah Baqraraah verse 8 Allaah
[Subhaanhu Wa Ta'aalaa] says:
The reason explained by Allaah Ta'aalaa is that:
“In their hearts is a disease; and Allaah has increased their disease: And grievous is the penalty they (incur), because they are false
(to themselves).” Means their views and belief are not true. Who are they? Every Muslim would like to know so that he can remain away from them to keep his belief and deeds safe from them. Our Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessing be upon him) says that Bani Israeel had 72/73 sects and my Ummah will be divided in 73 groups and 72 groups will be burnt in Hell while only one will go to Heaven. Companions of Hazrat Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) asked who that successful group would be. The Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) said this would be Najiaa sect, the followers of me and my companions. Moreover he said that my Ummah will not go astray but when you see them indulged in wrong doings you must hold on to the largest group to be answerable. And the largest group’s name is Ahle-Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at or Sunni group and now they are called Bareilvi as well. At present everyone call themselves Ahle-Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at ...how ... to differentiate and how we would discover who is on the right path! |
In our country Pakistan the famous and matchless speaker of Islaamic world, famous orator and scholar of Islaam and the Mujaddid-e-Maslak-e-Ahle Sunnat, Khateeb-e-A’zam Hazrat Maulana Muhammad Shafee Okarvi’s (Allaah have mercy on him) son, and successor the renowned scholar Allamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi wrote a book “Deoband to Bareily.” The book has been published in Urdu, English and many other languages in thousands. In this book Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi has written the basic reasons of Sunni Bareilvi "Differences" and has taken 40 references from the authentic books of Deobandi scholars.
|
As all people don’t read these books and in many areas these books are not available especially in foreign countries these books are not available in Urdu. People might think that these references are not from authentic books so Maulana Okarvi Academy [Al'Aalami ] decided on the wishes of friends to prepare a video documentary proof of these references to the public. We prepared this video in an evening at Maulana Okarvi’s personal library to convey to public real facts about Ahle-Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at to enable them to identify them and convey the basic beliefs of Deobandi group.
This is the first video and we would In shaa Allaah prepare videos about other wrong groups. To clarify we declare that our purpose is not creating any disturbance or restlessness in society and the preaching and publications of Najias from Ahle-Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at beliefs and deeds should not be taken as sectarianism. Rather it is an effort to show right path to the Muslims for which every Muslim prays to God in every rakaat of the prayer. Also it is an effort to preserve the facts from proof and document for generation to come. Hope viewers would correct themselves after watching these videos and strengthen their relation with Maslak e Haq Ahle-Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at the righteous and the largest group and safeguard themselves and their family from corrupting their faith and belief. This web page is the effort of Maulana Okarvi Academy Al'alami to present the English translation of those videos for those readers who do not know Urdu... also please click on the images of the books for large scans for better reading. |
Allamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: Nahamadu Wa Nusali Wa Nusalimoo Ala Habeebiyal Kareem Wa Ala Alaiehi Wa Ashaabihi Ajma’een- A’oozu Bill-Laahi Minash-shaie taa Nir –Rajeem Bismil-Laahir-Rahmaa Nir- Raheem Muhtaram Maulana Qaari Muhammad Jahangir Sahib Naqshbandi is here and I request him to tell us the meaning and purpose of his visit. Jee Qaari Sahib-Qaari Muhammad Jahangir: Bismil-Laahir-Rahmaa Nir- Raheem -As-Salaatu Was-Salaamu ‘Alaieka Yaa Rasoolal-Laah Hazrat Sahib my request to you is that your book Deoband to Bareily has been published and thousands of people have read it. For the satisfaction and trust of believers of Ahle-Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at please present the authentic books to prove your references in this video that you gave in your book. So our basic differences with Deobandi scholars become crystal clear by witnessing them and we will not only keep ourselves for becoming astray but it will help make other Muslim brothers and sisters follow the right path too. Also by seeing these references with our own eyes from the real books our doubt and suspicion will clear and it will not only enforce our beliefs but will also erase any confusion we have in our minds. We request you to show us the origin of the 40 references in your book as proof and to guide the generations to come. So everybody would know that these... difference are not based on trivialities but on fundamental and principle differences and is due to the impertinence [Disrespect] to the Muhammad-ur- Rasoolal- Laah [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], May Allaah Ta'aalaa bless you with knowledge and good deeds. |
1. REFERENCE
God can tell a lie
Name of the book is Fatawaa Rasheediyah, page 19 Volume 1.
Sir please show us the origin of this reference?
Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani:
Your purpose is that all the references I have given in my book “Deoband to Bareilly”, I should present to the viewer the original books from where I have taken them so that people would come to know that these are true given and not fake. The first book is Fatawaa Rasheediyah from which I have taken reference for my book Deoband to Bareilly and you referenced it. Its title is Fatawaa Rasheediyah Part one, dated 1363 Hijri and published by Raheemia Khutub Khanna Urdu Bazar Book Delhi. The name of the book is Fatawaa Rasheediyah Mubawab Volume one, you referred to its page 19. This is the page 19, in which he wrote [Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi ] “Possibility of telling lie is that lie is in Allaah’s power” then again he writes again here, “Lie is in the power of Allaah” then writes again “Lie is in Allaah’s power.” Here again is written that lie is in the powers of Allaah means that a lie is not out of Allaah’s powers. In this sentence what he [Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi] is trying to say is that lie is in the power of Allaah To further prove this the reference is given by him is that Allaah is “ Wa Huuwa A’laa Qulli Shai’in Qadeer” Meaning Allaah is Omnipotent”, if HE is Almighty and Al Qaadir then a lie is also part of his Being. |
This is the reference of the book “Fatawaa Rasheediyah” part one published in Delhi India. They published this book in collection with the name of “Talifaat-e-Rashhediyah” in Karachi. This is its inner title page, “Talifaat-e-Rashhediyah with Talifaat-e-Rashhediyah” written by Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi and is published by Islaamiat Organization, Anarkali Lahore and they have given them high epithets.
|
Even in this book that thing is present, first we would see list of contents that they have arranged. Kitab ul Aqaid page18, topic is
“The Attribution of Lie to Allaah”, at page 98 same scripts is given “possibility of telling lie is that lie is in Allaah’s power” means Allaah can tell a lie, God forbid, God forbid Ma'azallaah). I seek Allaah Ta'aalaa’s shelter. If anyone blames me for writing this sentence from myself, I have shown the original books from those I have taken these sentences. |
If this is not enough I can further explain it with the help of third book I have “Tazkiratur Khaleel” written by Khalil Anbethwi, published by Qasmia Publishing House Rangpur Road in Sialkot City. Have a glimpse of its inner title as well “Tazkiratur Khaleel”, here the names of people have written who have contributed to this book though the book is written by A'ashiq Ilaahie. It was published in 1969, see on the page 135, here it is written clearly that this is totally confirmed that what is in the capacity of man is in the powers of Allaah. It gives meanings that what a man can do is also in the powers of Allaah Ta'alaa. It suggests that if man has ability to tell a lie, Allaah Ta'aalaa can also tell a lie. He is proving his point by saying that if we say that a man can do something that is not in the powers of Allaah Ta'aalaa it seems that Allaah’s powers lacks in comparison with human being. With this argument they are initiating that it is possible that Allaah Ta'aalaa can have all the flaws. |
Furthermore, there is another argument in the book “Al-Jahd- ul-Muqeel” written by Maulana Mahmud Hasan, the teacher of Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi. This is its inner title and it was published by Madinia Publishing House Urdu Bazar Lahore, written on the topic of the problem of Lie in Allaah Ta'alaa ’s powers and is stated as the best book by them. This book that I have was published in Shabaan 1409 Hijri from Lahore which I have with me. On its page 41, behold its statement that how can we rule out bad deeds from the most ancient Allaah Ta'alaa powers. It tells that wrong doings are also in Allaah Ta'alaa powers. If I have referred that scholars of Deobandi Wahaabi, and Tableeghi preaching groups believe that Allaah can tell a lie in my book then I have shown you all the four books which were quoted. Next Reference… |
REFERENCE # 2
Maulana Qari Muhammad Jahangir Naqshbandi:
Allaah Ta'aalaa has no prior knowledge about the future deeds of human beings and Allaah Ta'aalaa
comes to know only when they act or
they have done something …
“Tafseer Bulghatul Haieraan” page 157, 158.
Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani:
This reference of Tafseer Bulghatul Haieraan that you just read I also present the book to you. This Tafseer Bulghatul Haieraan fi Rabt e Aayat ul Qur’aan, is the name of book. Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi’s disciple and Ghulam Khan from Rawalpindi whom he called Ghulam Ullah’s teacher Husaien Ali from Wan Bhuchran wrote this book named Tafseer Bulghatul Haieraan fi Rabt e Aayat ul Qur’aan, was published by Himayat e Islaam Press. Here you can see the word Wan Bhuchran, Mianwaali here. He belonged to Mianwaali and issued the book from there. On page… Page 157?? |
3. REFERENCE
Knowledge of Shaietaan [Satan] and the Angel of death [Maalik ul Maut] is more than the Holy Prophet
(Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam).
(Baraaheen-e-Qaati’ah, pg 51)
(Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam).
(Baraaheen-e-Qaati’ah, pg 51)
4-REFERENCE
Allaah's’ Nabee Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) has no knowledge of his
of his end and what is behind the wall? Baraaheen-e-Qaati'ah, page 51.
Allaah's’ Nabee Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) has no knowledge of his
of his end and what is behind the wall? Baraaheen-e-Qaati'ah, page 51.
Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: This is the same book that I showed earlier, Baraaheen-e-Qaati'ah, on the same page 51 where he proved Shaietaan and Maalik ul Maut’s knowledge. He himself wrote and referred to Shaiekh Abdul Haq ...referring to Prophet Muhammad's Knowledge of the unseen [who has never written this thing anywhere in his book] he wrote that “I had no knowledge of what is behind the wall. Shaeikh Abdul Haq had not written this in his book. He is several times asked to prove his reference with argument where this statement is given. If he referred to Kitaab al Madarij but this is not written in that book. Actually he referred to Abdul Haq but wrote this from himself that the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],has no knowledge of what is behind the wall. The Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], who gave us the knowledge of Allaah Kareem, the Prophet who gave us the knowledge of Universe and this world, how can he say that he knows nothing what is behind the wall? I am unable to understand and comprehend how a person can be called Allamah when he denies the knowledge of the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], So believing that the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], says he is unable to see behind the wall is totally wrong for the reason that the book they referred has no such statement and is totally fabricated. It proves that Deobandi Wahaabee’s have taken it from some other reference; their intention is to prove their “Point Of View” though Shaeikh Abdul Haq although he has not written this. But they have proved their belief by writing this in their books this is their Aqeedah that Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], says he has no knowledge of what is behind the wall. Having this belief is absolute insolence and disrespectful and against the saying of Qur’aan and Sunnah. We, Ahle-Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at have no such belief [Aqeedah] like that. I have shown you the book to which I referred in my book. |
5- REFERENCE
Allaah has blessed Prophet Hazrat [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], the kind and amount of knowledge shared by kids, animals and mad.... Nauzu Billaah Min Zaalik. Book Kitab Hifzul Ieemaan, page 7. Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: The book you referred, I have “Hifzul Iemaan” is written by Ashraf Ali Sahib Thanvi. Shaeikh Jan Muhammad Allaah Baksh Tajran Kutb Uloom e Mashrqi, Kashmiri Bazaar Lahore in June 1934 published at Karimi Printing Press Lahore. I have its new edition too that I got from Deoband. The book named “Hifzul Ieemaan” has this written on its page 7 that: If we believe that Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], is given Ilm e Ghaib [Knowledge of the Unseen] then what type of Ilm e Ghaib [Knowledge of the Unseen]does he has? Now the question is whether he is given Baz Uloom e Ghaybia [Some Knowledge of the Unseen ] or Kul Aloom e Ghaybia [Full Knowledge of the Unseen]. If it is Baz Aloom e Ghaybia [Some Knowledge of the Unseen] then what is specific or Greatness of the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],? This type of knowledge is given to Zayd O Ammaar [Anyone] in fact even to Sabi Majnun, Haywaan ...human being, even to madmen and animals. This is written by Maulana Thanvi in which what he said about Hazrat Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], As everyone has some knowledge that others don’t know then everyone should be called Aalim ul Ghayb. [Aalim of the Unseen].This is the statement written by Maulana Ahsraf Ali Thanvi. Firstly whatever he has said about Hazrat PROPHET Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], let me explain I will explain through my book “Haqaaiq”[The Facts]. I have given the reference of this book as you can see here in my book Haqaiq. Whatever we write we give its all the details in our book as I have given here. Actually somebody asked from Maualana Thanvi that is here on this page, anyone who is interested can see it. The question is that Zaid means anybody asks that Ilm e Ghayb has two types. Bi zaat [By Self] means that there could be no one Aalim e Ghayb except Allaah Ta'aalaa and Ba waasta [By Help] means that the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], is Aalim ul Ghayb. How is this argument of Zaid? He asks two things that Bi zaat [By Himself] implies to know Ghayb himself. Ghayb [Unseen] is the knowledge beyond senses. That Bi zaat [By Self] is the knowledge that no one has except Allaah Ta'alaa. Ba waasta [By Help] is the knowledge that Allaah Ta'alaa has blessed the Prophet, [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], what is this argument? He wants to know about keeping this Aqeedah and Istidlaal about the Knowledge of Unseen which the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] has. Firstly Maulana Thanvi denies clearly writes that the word Aalim ul Ghaib [Knower of Unseen] could not be applied to Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam]. Itlaaq is to use some specific word for something is Itlaaq and when something is proved for something is called Hukum. Sometimes Hukum and Itlaaq are used simultaneously but sometimes Hukum is proved true but Itlaaq doesn’t. It is something else, one thing is hukum for something and the other is to use some word for someone. |
Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi:
It is forbidden to use words of Aalim ul Ghaieb, and to have complete Ilm ul Ghaieb is not possible through wisdom. And that the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], has complete knowledge of Ghaieb could not be proved through wisdom. If indirect Ilm ul Ghaieb, that Allaah Ta'aalaa has given him, is Baaz means a little then Maulana Thanvi writes that it is to confer Ilm e Ghaieb on the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], if true by anyone (Maulana Thanvi is not admitting it) then the question is whether is it Kul Ghaieb or Baaz Ghaieb? If it is Baz Ilm e Ghaieb and not Qull Ilm e Ghaieb then it is not special with the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], just like Ilm e Ghaieb is given to everyone, every child, animals and even beasts are given too. Word here used for simile. Here the knowledge of Prophet (Peace be upon him) is mentioned like the knowledge of animals, mad and children is the worst act of disgrace towards the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) It is the severest act of disgrace for that Thanvi has not yet asked for forgiveness. People used to say that he has changed the text as written in the other books. He used words the Ghayr e Ambiyaa instead of animals and mad but these words are not the proof of his forgiveness. If someone says that he begged pardon then it has to prove. The people who are fighting over this also seek forgiveness. Some people say the word ‘aisa’ means like or as much but in both cases this word is used for simile and disgrace. This is severe insolence to mention the knowledge of the Holy Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], like animals and Thanvi has neither begged pardon nor changed the text and it is sheer insolence of Thanvi. God [Allaah Taa'laa] forbid for this act of insolence and I have shown you the real text |
6-REFERENCE
Thinking about the Holy Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],
during prayers is worse than thinking about ox and donkey.
(God forbid) Book Siraat e Mustaqeem, page 86.Persian Publication
NEW EDITION
Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi:
I am showing you the book Siraat e Mustaqeem, published in 1308 AH by Maktba Mujtbai Delhi and written by Ismaeel Dehlvi. Some people say that this book is not written by Ismaeel Dehlvi, I will present more facts about this too. With reference to your question on page 86, it is my habit to mark pages so I have marked these pages too. It is in Persian that is the real book. I present its translation in the words as he himself did and I had not translated it myself. This book Siraat e Mustaqeem published in Pakistan. If this book is not translated and written by Ismaeel Dehlvi then why his name is written as translator and writer on the first page. If it is written by someone else then his name should be given. It is published by Maalik Siraaj Ud Deen and Sons publishers Lahore in November 1956. I show you the translation of that sentence by book Siraat e Mustaqeem on page 150. This book is translated by the people who share same belief with them. Some darkness or perverse has different levels, means less or more. If the thought of intimacy comes to your mind during prayers, it would be better to think about being intimate with your wife. Shaiekh (teacher) or like other elders no matter it would better then the thought of the Holy Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], would be worse than thinking about your ox or donkey. God forbid.!! Thinking about the Holy Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], during prayer and you involved in it is worse than thinking about your ox and donkey. He further argues because the thought of ox and donkey are trivial and not get you involved and the thoughts about shaiekh keeps one involved a lot for the respect he has for them. As the thought of ox and donkey has no involvement for its triviality and abjection. The thought of something respectful during prayers leads one to Shirk. He means that the thought of the Holy Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], would accompany with respect and thinking any one with respect during prayers leads to Shirk. Now he should be asked that without taking the name of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) there is no prayer at all. We take the name of Hazrat Muhammad (peace be upon him) we send Salaam to him with his name intentionally and think about him with respect. و رحمت اللہ و برکاتہ السلام عليك أيها النبي How is it possible not to think about him? Thought can come with respect or disrespect these are the two conditions only. |
Siraat e Mustaqeem ....the Urdu Publication
Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: And thinking contemptuously, with disrespect, hatred and inferiority is not allowed not only by us but it is the Ijmaa the opinion agreed upon by the majority that for the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaieh Wa Sallam] one cannot express any kind of disrespect. It is not even allowed to call the dress [Libaas Mubaarak] of the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaieh Wa Sallam] unclean disrespectfully . Even so if one call it this act is so severe that it could deprive the person of his Ieemaan [faith]. Likewise it is also forbidden to call the Muqqadas Mubaarak sacred shoes [Naalaayn Shareef] of the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaieh Wa Sallam] disrespectfully, if someone call it “Gudri” doing so would turn ONE to an infidel [Kaffir].Because saying so is sign of disrespect. No one dare to describe the personality or the attributes of the Nabee [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaieh Wa Sallam] disapprovingly. Now the thought of the Prophet (Peace be upon him) would definitely come and it will "Always" come with “RESPECT” respectfully in the prayers. But according to their writing, and opinion thinking about him Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaieh Wa Sallam] in Prayers is worse than thinking and immersing oneself in the thought about ox and donkey. Just think about this!!!! There are two things mentioned in this text, means they have analyzed their thoughts. One that thinking during prayers about intimate relationship with wife is better than illicit relationship. Secondly, thinking about the Prophet (Peace be upon him) is worse than thinking about ox and donkey…. Such an act of Disrespect!!! insolence and dishonor.!!!.Some might say that we have misquoted it but to avoid any misconception that we have written this statement ourselves, I have shown you both Urdu and Persian versions of the books. I am not replying here in detail about this otherwise I can give specifics about this issue. To study further about this topic my father Qiblah, I and other Sunni scholars have written in detail in their books. Hazrat Maulana Fazal e Haq Khaier Abaadi even gave Fatwaa e Kufr against Ismaeel Dehlvi, who was his contemporary. It is also said that he sought forgiveness and did repentance's [Rujooh], that is the reason some people don’t talk about him and they do not voice their opinion. To read answers for this and know the details consult books, I am just showing the reference books with actual words to prove the authenticity and genuineness’ of my references. |
Some deny that these books are not by them then I would like to clear here see this …
The book “Talifaat-e-Rashhediyah” is written by Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi that I have shown earlier. On page 241 of this book it is given that someone inquired and questioned who had written Taqweyat ul Ieemaan, wa-Ada ul Haq and Siraat e Mustaqeem,? In answer Gangohi himself wrote Siraat e Mustaqeem, and Ismaeel Dehlvi wrote Taqweyat ul Ieemaan. I am presenting the witness of their greatest scholar against those who claim that Siraat e Mustaqeem, is not their book. Their printing itself advertises that these books are written by Ismaeel Dehlvi, now even after seeing these books then someone still denies the fact that’s up to him/her ….other than that we can prove by showing you these several references. |
Maulana Qari Muhammad Jahangir Naqshbandi:
7-REFERENCE You referred that they say: Word “Rahmatul lil Aalameen” is not specific to describe the attribute of the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],and others can also be called Rahmatul lil Aalameen.. Book Fatawa Rasheediya, page 12 part two. Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: Fataawa Rasheediyah written by Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi was published by Kutub Khana Raheemia Sunehri Masjid Delhi in 1357 Hijri that I have. It was issued by Khawaja Barki press Delhi, on its page 9 see the question is asked, from Ulamaa e Deen is the word Rahmatul lil Aalameen specific for the Prophet (Peace be upon him) or can be used for others too? In this Book ...a Question have been asked is that the title "Rahmatul lil Aalameen" is the title only be specific contributed to the Holy Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], or any one can also be called Rahmatul lil Aalameen? Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi answers that “Rahmatul lil Aalameen” is not the attribute [Siffat e Khassa] of the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], only, but other Auliyaa, Ambiya and Ulamaa e Rabbani can also be attributed with this tittle. Since they are also a blessing for the world although the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], is the greatest of all. So, to use the word for others is allowed”, by Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi. |
m
But they call Ulaama e Rabbaniyeen only to themselves, What they mean that the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam is the great Rahmatul lil Aalameen whereas Deobandi’s are small Rahmatul lil Aalameen. God forbid [Ma'az Allaah] To them Rahmatul lil Aalameen is not the specific attribute of the Prophet [Sallal Laahu laiehi Wa Sallam, Is this not the denial of Qur’aan? I have shown their book for proof so no one has misconception that I myself say it and can be seen in their book Taleefaat e Rasheediyah too. |
REFERENCE- 8
To the common people, the expression “Khaatim-un-Nabiy-yeen” means the “Last Prophet.” To the knowledgeable people this meaning is not correct…… Even if a Prophet was born after the holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam) it would still have no effect on the concept of the finality of Muhammad (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam). (Tahzeerun-Naas, pg 3 and 25) |
Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi It is the denial of Khatm un Nabuwat of the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], The name of the book is Tahzeer un-Naas, written by Muhammad Qaasim the founder of Dar ul Uloom Deoband and published by Mutba Qasmi Deoband. The date of publication should be given on the first page, but it has not….please see this On its page 3 he clearly writes that according to general public the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], (look here he used the word “صلعم" in short form though he himself forbids to avoid disgrace) Khatum means that the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],’s period is the last and he is the last of all the Prophets. But scholars [Ahle – Fahm, People of Knowledge] know that coming later or earlier has nothing to do with greatness then calling the Prophet (Peace be upon him) Khatum un Nabiyeen is not lawful. Here Nanotwi clearly says that Khatum un Nabiyeen does not mean the LAST Prophet, it might be view among the “Aam” [common people] but among the wise people [The Scholars] it is not a matter of greatness to come earlier or later. Then how could it be right to call the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],Khatum un Nabiyeen. Here he has openly and clearly denied the meanings of Khatam un Nabiyeen as the last prophet. This is not my VIEW but Ulaama e Deoband has agreed upon that those who do not admit or denies Khatam un Nabiyeen’s meanings as the last Prophet to Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] are declared “Kaffir”[Apostate]. They themselves say that anyone not declaring Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu Alaiehi Wa Sallam] as the Last Prophet is "Kaffir"...but somehow they say nothing about this!!!! And they don’t hold their elder’s scholar answerable and do not say anything to them or about them! Is this JUSTICE [Is this ADL]? Saving someone for their own relation,[Zaat] is it justice? It is the matter of Ieemaan and Kufr, Honor and Respect of the Holy Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], and the reality of Qur’aan. It is the matter of truth and honor of Islaam and its[Sadaqat]. Is their honor more important than the respect of the Holy Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam]. This is what I want to explain, I only want to tell you the real Differences [Ikhtilaaf] Between Deobandi and Barielly [Actually the real word was Sunni and Wahaabee] what the real difference is….? |
Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: Deobandi and Wahaabe [real word was Sunni and Wahaabee] difference is that Deobandi’s are a branch of Wahaabe’s and they started calling themselves Sunnis as well and have labeled us and started calling us [Barelvi]. We are Ahle-Sunnat Wa Jamaa’atand we do not belong to Bareily we belong to Pakistan. Belonging from different part of the country ….Those who live in Bareily could be called Bareilvi but Yes! One can call us Bareilvi for our association [Nisbat] with Imaam e Ahle Sunnat Ala Hazrat Maulana Shah Ahmad Raza Fazl e Haq Bareilvi (Rahmatul Laahi ‘Alaieh). Because we share the same belief with him, we are “Ham Maslak”[We Follow the Same Creed Aqeedah] The “Bareilvi” term used by us is just for identity WE are not some sect, we belong to Ahle-Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at. I am telling you that they have clearly denied this… I am just the clarifying some facts. In this book they denied the Prophet (Peace be upon him)’s Khatm e Nabuwat on not one but on several places. On page 25 of the same book he writes clearly: If suppose after the period of the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] some prophet born even then cannot harm the Khatmiat e Muhammadi. Means they accept it is possible that some prophet born by saying suppose. Firstly the Author is suggesting that it can be “Possible” [Mumkin] that another Prophet can come after Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam]. Why is he suggesting “Suppose” [Bil Farz].Something which is impossible [Na Mumkin] it is impossible. Why is he Supposing and suggesting It is like saying if the author is disgraced publically [Beaten up with hundred shoes… his image will not get tarnished or to say that someone would remain alive if his throat would cut with some dagger or Nikah shall remain intact even after giving Talaaq thrice. In such cases they would not agree and bring numerous arguments. It is clearly written here that there could come a Prophet after the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] and denied the meanings of Khatum un Nabiyeen. Then said if born a prophet even then it will make no difference to the Khatmiat e Muhammadi even if a prophet is sent to the same land or some other land. They have openly and clearly denied the khatm e Nabuwat of the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] Which is the next page of the reference there is another reference? This one was 25. |
On page 13 it clearly written:
If for example there is any Prophet in the time of the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] even then he will still remain Khatam because they have taken the word Khatam in other meanings. They do not accept Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam]as the last Prophet they do not accept the meaning of the word “Khatam” as the Final …they use this word in a some other meaning as … Afzal. Then what is the difference between Qaidiani’s and them? For then by saying this they share the same belief with Qaidiani’s that the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] was not last but preeminent Prophet. So they favored Qaidiani’s by writing this book and provided them a chance. This is the reason that Wahaabee’s / Deobandi’s have no argument when Qaidiani’s come to them. These are the three references that I read out to you from the books to prove their authenticity. These references are not fake and we have shown you from the real book. |
Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi
9-REFERENCE
The Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] learnt Urdu
through his relation with Deobandi scholars.
Book Reference Baraaheen-e-Qaati’ah page 26.
_
10-REFERENCE
The Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] should be respected only like elder brother...
Book -Taqwiyatul leemaan
The Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] should be respected only like elder brother...
Book -Taqwiyatul leemaan
The Prophet (Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam) should only be respected as an elder brother. [Taqwiyatul leemaan, pg 58].
Allamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: This text you read is written by Ismaeel Dehlvi whom people know as Balakot ka Shaheed, who participated in Jihaad along with Saiyyid Ahmad and people, remembers him for his Jihaad. He has named his book “Taqwiyatul leemaan”, the one to strengthen Ieemaan, though he should name it “Tafwiyat ul Ieemaan” by removing just one dot from ق to change it to ف meaning the one which deprives you of faith. See his name is written with lots of epithets whom the call shaheed. It is published by Matbu a Faiz e Aam Delhi that I have. Its year of publication is not printed here and still available in the market. They think it important to print and distribute it all over the world. Before giving references I would like to present the importance of this book in their eyes. This is the same book “Taleefat e Rasheediya” by Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi, I will present from this book how importance they give to this book named Taqwiyatul leemaan”, he has praised this book on several places. On page 84 he writes: Book Taqwiyatul leemaan is a matchless for Rad e Shirk and Kuffr. Its arguments are taken from Qur’aan and Hadees. Keeping, reading and practicing on it are just Islaam and will recompense in the life hereafter. How highly they regard this book!! Let see he has written clearly that Ismaeel Dehlvi is Jannati. On page 88 he writes that the book ‘Taqwiyatul leemaan” is so great and true book that enhances and corrects Ieemaan. And the writer is favorite of Allaah Al Kareem etc etc. He has mentioned Taqwiyatul leemaan on many places. I just showed this to make you understand what the status of that person in their eyes is. Which reference you gave? Maulana Qari Muhammad Jahangir Naqshbandi: Page 58 Allamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: Page 58, let me show you. This book has almost 70 Kuffriat. Just notice the first sentence at Page 58: All human beings are brothers, the one who is elder should respect him like the elder brother and God is Maalik of all of them. This Hadees tells that Auliyaa, Ambiyaa, Imaam o Imaamzada, Peer and Shaheed are all our Allaah Almighty’s beloved but human beings and our brothers. Allaah Kareem has blessed them greatness so they are elder brothers and we are ordered to obey them, we are their younger and should respect them like human beings. Actually in Qur’aan it is ordered to respect the Prophet (Peace be upon him) Allamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: It is in Qur’aan e Pak to respect the Prophet (Peace be upon him) and don’t call the Prophet (Peace be upon him) like you used to call one another. They are saying that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) is elder brother and they are younger brothers. Though the Holy Qur’aan tells that the wives of the Prophet (Peace be upon him) are the mothers of Mumineen. Is the husband of mother called brother? They don’t get this till today. They write that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) should be regarded as elder brother and we are younger brothers and respect him. We don’t respect the Prophet (Peace be upon him) like Allaah Al Kareem rather we respect him like a human being, a creation of Allaah Ta’aala. But regard him like a human being who is matchless and no one is like him. They are regarding him like elder brother that is evident … here they have written Auliyaa and Ambiyaa. God forgive. |