Quick Links
INTRODUCTION -WHY THE DIFFERENCES?.....Read on
REFERENCES 1-11...Read on
REFERENCES -11-20
REFERENCES 20-40... Read on
INTRODUCTION -WHY THE DIFFERENCES?.....Read on
REFERENCES 1-11...Read on
REFERENCES -11-20
REFERENCES 20-40... Read on
REFERENCE #20:
The ones, who have names Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] or
Alee, have no authority. Nabee and Walee can do nothing,
book Taqwiyatul leemaan,, page 41.
The ones, who have names Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] or
Alee, have no authority. Nabee and Walee can do nothing,
book Taqwiyatul leemaan,, page 41.
Allamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi There is one reference remaining, check this one. This is the book Taqwiyatul leemaan, page 41, here clearly written: Those who have the names of Muhammad or Alee [Ali] have no authority. Here it is clearly written that Prophet Muhammad or Hazrat Alee [Ali] [Radiyal Laahu Anhu] have no authority. Because people also call and give [Naraa] in the name of Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], and Hazrat Alee. [May be someone thinks that they are mentioning common people with these names but here it is specially written about the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], because the Prophet [Peace be upon him] is the Leader of all the Prophets and Hazrat Alee [Radiyal Laahu Anhu] is the Leader of all the Walee’s...[Saints]. People raise slogan of ‘Yaa Alee’ and he has written it straightforwardly and openly in different places that those who have names of Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], and Alee [Rahmatul Laahi Alaieh] are not authorized for anything. They are openly denying the authority of Ambiyaa and Auliyaa by using extremely disrespectful language for the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], Ambiyaa,[The Prophet’s] Shuhadaa [The Martyrs ]and Aaima [The General Public]. This reference is present in the book that is presented. |
REFERENCE #21:
The Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],
became unconscious has lost his wits. [Ma’aazal Laah] book
Taqwiyatul leemaan, page 55.
The Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],
became unconscious has lost his wits. [Ma’aazal Laah] book
Taqwiyatul leemaan, page 55.
Allamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi This is from the book Taqwiyatul leemaan,, page 55, it is clearly written that the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], has become unconscious with fear when heard this thing from an ignorant. [Ma’aazal’ Laah]. You can see here what they have written.....they are not even mindful to write Durood Shareef fully but write only Salaam. Writing such disrespectful thing about the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], that he became unconscious could only be done by such people who have no respect. It is a known fact that we use different tone and words for our friend, father, teacher or other elders. Tone and choice of words become different for our elders. We are taught and respect our elders… Using these kinds of wording for Prophet Muhamamad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] If this is not disrespect than what is??. They have no regard and respect for the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam]. In the Qur’aan Allaah [Ta'alaa] has clearly forbidden the companions of the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], to use the word ‘Raeana’ for the Prophet (Peace be upon him) for the reason among others that shepherd is called ‘Raai’. Because the ‘Raena’ can be taken in wrong meanings if pronounced differently that’s why Allaah Ta'alaa has forbidden using this word for the Prophet (Peace be upon him) only to avoid any possibility of disrespect and here they have clearly using wrong words. As Jews use to use this word in other meanings. Allaah [Ta’aalaa] has stopped the Muslim from using this word for his Beloved Rasool [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], out of probability of lack of respect, and here they are openly DISRESPECTING the Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam].Can we still spare or ignore these words these writings…Only a disrespectful person towards the Prophet (Peace be upon him) can spare these people. And the one who considers the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], Baad Az Khuda Buzurg Tu-hee, Kissaa Mukhtaasar As the most respectful after God [Allaah Ta'aalaa] among all the creation of God cannot tolerate and accept this. They have written such disgraceful utterance in their books…I have shown the origin of this reference from the book. |
REFERENCE #22:
A Follower apparently excels in deeds than the Prophet [Peace be upon], book
Tahzeer un-Naas, page 5.
A Follower apparently excels in deeds than the Prophet [Peace be upon], book
Tahzeer un-Naas, page 5.
Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: Before presenting that reference I present a reference from Taqwiyatul leemaan, page 54, it is written that Allaah Ta'alaa possesses great magnificence and that all the Prophet’s and Auliyaa are trivial than a speck before him. It is written here in a few lines before the previous reference that the Prophet Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], became unconscious before an ignorant. It is clearly said here that the Prophets and Auliyaa [The Saints] are trivial than specks before Allaah Ta'aalaa. Are we allowed to say this, it is another matter that the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], can use himself any word to Allaah Ta'alaa showing humbleness. Hazrat Aadam [Alaiehis Salaam] prayed to Allaah Al Kareem humbly: Rabbana Zalamna Anfusana Wa In Lam Taghfirlana Wa Tarhamna Lana Koonanna Minal Khasireen Translation: Our Lord!We have sinned against ourselves and unless You grant us forgiveness and bestow Your mercy upon us, we shall most certainly be lost. On the basis of this Dua can we call Hazrat Aadam [Alaiehis Salaam] a sinner as he used for himself, we can definitely not. We can’t use any of his word as argument while praying humbly to Allaah [Ta'aalaa]. And he is clearly saying that all the Prophets and Auliyaa are inferior to a speck before Allaah [Ta'aalaa] magnificence. Did they only get these word to express Allaah Kareem’s majesty. If they have to praise the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], to explain Allaah Ta'alaa’s majesty that Allaah Ta'alaa is so majestic, than it should have been explain like this ...that HE created a magnificent human being like the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him). It is not at all permissible to express Allaah [Ta'aalaa’s] majesty by insulting his Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam]; through this they will earn only the wrath and anger of Allaah [Ta'aalaa]. The person who writes Nabee [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] is inferior to speck and lower than a cobbler he himself is inferior to speck and cobbler. The Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],’s greatness is known to Allaah [Subhaanahu Wa Ta'alaa]. He has has sent tthe whole Holy Qur’aan in his honor. In the Qur’aan Allaah [Ta’aalaa] mentions and calls all the Ambiyaa [The Prophets] like Ohh Aadam!, Ohh Nooh!, Oh Ibraaheem, Oh Moosaa! and calls our Beloved Prophet (Peace be upon him) with great regard like Yaa Ayuu Har Rasool, Yaa Ayuu Han Nabee O, Yaseen, Tahaa, Yaa Ayuuhal Mudassar. If Allaah Ta'alaa is calling his creation with so much respect despite being the creator of The Prophet (Peace be upon him) then how much should we give respect him respect. It’s a lesson for us as human being Allaah [Ta'aalaa’s] creation that we show utmost respect to our Prophet Muhammad [Peace be Upon Him]. May God [Allaah Kareem] keep us save from uttering and writing such statements,and save us from disrespecting our Beloved Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu Alaiehi Wa Sallam]. |
To reply your question here is the book Tehzeer un Naas by Qasim Nanotwi the founder of Darul Uloom Deoband. This book has been shown previously too, check its title. On its page 5 it is written:
If Ambiyaa are distinct from their Ummat, they are distinct in knowledge only and Ummat equals to them in deeds apparently often and even sometimes excel in deeds. What they are implying is and what they mean to say is that Ambiya are only distinct in Knowledge while their companion says Shaietaan and Maalik al Maut have more knowledge. They are in habit of saying strange things like that. In deeds mostly Ummat equals and sometimes even excels. Although the Prophet (Peace be upon him) says if my companions give handful oats in the way of Allaah Ta'alaa and the one who is not my companion give gold equal to Uhad Mountain even then my companion will be superior. Perhaps they would say its a matter of Sawaab and not deed then I would say could the deed of the Prophet (Peace be upon him)’s companion and other one be equal? Then why is it a protest against Sipaah e Sihaabaa? Why is all this that other people are not considered superior in deeds than the Prophet (Peace be upon him)’s companion? Then we have to accept that they consider the Prophet (Peace be upon him) like themselves but even think to supersede him in deeds. [Aamaal] While a Muslim believes the Prophet (Peace be upon him) superior to all in Allaah Kareem's creation in Knowledge and deeds, he is named Ahmad and Muhammad (Peace be upon him). Ahmad means who praises Allaah Ta'alaa the most. He has been praising Allaah [Ta'aalaa] since his birth means before the creation of universe. His name is Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], Muhammad means the one who is praised again and again. His Greatness is measure by the fact that the Creator himself praises his beloved Habeeb Prophet Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam]. In my word Let me say this!!! It is possible that there would be no one to praise Allaah [Ta'aalaa] in the world when all the human beings would come to an end even then the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], would be praised by Allaah [ Subhaanhu Wa Ta'aalaa].Because Allaah Kareem lives for ever. Inn Allaaha Wa Malaikatahu Yu Salluna Alan Nabee Ya Ayyuhal Lazeena Amanu Sallu Alaiehi Wa Sallimu Tasleemaa Allaah and His angels shower blessings on the Nabee (Prophet). You who believe! Ask blessings on him and salute him with a worthy salutation. [Qur’aan: Al Ahzab Chapter 33] So the Prophet Praise will remain as Allaah [Ta'aalaa] is and shall remain forever and forever. No beginning and end for Allaah [Ta'aalaa], HE has been praising the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], before the creation of anything and HE shall remain busy in his praise when this mortal world will be no more. They say that sometimes Ummat excels in deeds than Allaah [Ta'aalaa]. They wanted to prove their superiority to the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], in deeds and forgetting that those who understand themselves better or superior to the Prophet (Peace be upon him) are not Muslims. Anyone who consider himself/herself better than Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],does not remain in the fold of Islaam. You have seen this reference too. |
Maulana Qari Muhammad Jahangir Naqshbandi:
REFERENCE #23:
Deobandi scholars have saved the Prophet Muhammad
[Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], from slipping on the Pul siraat,[the Bridge]
book Bulghatul Haieraan,
page 8.
REFERENCE #23:
Deobandi scholars have saved the Prophet Muhammad
[Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], from slipping on the Pul siraat,[the Bridge]
book Bulghatul Haieraan,
page 8.
Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: This is the book Bulghatul Haieraan Fi Rabt e Ayaatul Qur’aan by the disciple of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi and Ghulam Ahmad Khan from Rawalpindi’s teacher. The reference you gave is…. He writes that he saw the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],in a dream and met and hugged him on the Pul siraat [the bridge over which the righteous will pass into Paradise] and saved him from falling on Pul siraat …though writing text in Arabic and wrote the word Pul siraat in Urdu. He interpreted the dream as he is saving the religion of the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], by saving the Prophet (Peace be upon him) from falling. But he is clear in saying that he saved the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], falling from Pul siraat see his text here. Another thing I want to explain here is that some people believe and me too that the world of dreams is quite different from this world. There is difference in the sentences of dream and reality. But such statements about the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], are never said in dreams even. Sometimes people see the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], in dream and say many things about but none ever said anything like that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) was falling from Pul siraat and I saved him. The one who believes that Allaah [Ta'aalaa] has no prior knowledge about the deeds of the people and comes to know when the deeds are done. How can we believe in the dreams of such person even though he tells about his good dream? Because before interpreting a dream the belief of the person who is telling his dream is also taken into consideration.How can we believe him...because His belief [Aqeedah] is not right about the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], he even writes that it is permissible to call the Prophet (Peace be upon him) a "Taghoot". How can we accept his dream truthful? The people who say that it is a statement of the dream I want to tell that before interpreting any dream we have to take into account the belief of the person who dreamt it. Such people who tells fake dreams, what they say about the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], cannot be considered true. Those who think about the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], like that are wrong whether they talk about getting ticket from Madinah to Lahore or they say that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) say that Dar ul Uloom Deoband belongs to him. All such dreams are not acceptable because the people who are dreaming them are not dependable. Their condition [Haal] is not such that we can trust them.!!! |
Maulana Qari Muhammad Jahangir Naqshbandi:
REFERENCE #24:
There is no harm in saying and it is satisfying to say Laa'llaaha il-lal Laahu
Ashraf ‘Alee Rasool-ul-Laah and Allaahum-ma Salli 'Ala Saiy-yidina
Wa Nabeey-yina Ashraf ‘Alee and there is no harm in saying so.
REFERENCE #24:
There is no harm in saying and it is satisfying to say Laa'llaaha il-lal Laahu
Ashraf ‘Alee Rasool-ul-Laah and Allaahum-ma Salli 'Ala Saiy-yidina
Wa Nabeey-yina Ashraf ‘Alee and there is no harm in saying so.
[Risaalah Al lmdaad, pg 35] for the month of Safar 1336 A.H, and proceedings of a Munaazirah [religious debate in Gaya] Al Furqaan, vol 3, pg 58) Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: This is Risaalah Al lmdaad -month Safar al Muzzafar 1336 Hijri, published by Imdaad ul Mutaab e Thana Bhawan and name of Ashraf Ali Thanvi is written here. On its page 34, 35 he writes: One day while viewing Risalaah Hussn ul Aaziz in the noon I felt sleepy, put the Risalaah down and turned the other side. Then the thought came to my mind that I have my back towards the Risalaah,I took it and kept it on the side of my head. After some time I dream t that I recited Kalimaah Laa'llaaha il-lal Laahu Ashraf ‘Alee Rasool-ul-Laah, taking the name of Maulana Thanvi in place of the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], I thought of my mistake in reciting Kalimaah and wanted to recite it rightly but again took the name of Maulana Thanvi spontaneously. Though I knew that this was not the right kalimaah. When I did it for few times and saw Maulana Thanvi in front of me and due to over whelming emotions fell down, screamed and then felt weakness. I woke up and felt too weak myself and had numbness in body but remained thinking about Maulana Thanvi during dream and wakefulness. Then I thought I should rectify and correct my mistake of reciting Kalimah wrongly, avoiding this mistake anymore and compensate the mistakes of reciting Kalimah since I was in the state of dream. I sat up and started reading Darood Shareef trying to correct myself now... I am fully awake and fully aware and not in the state of dream. Maa’z Allaah, Sumaa Maa’z Allaah. Now in his own word he is writing I even do not want to bring those sentences to my tongue but even then he is writing to Thanvi.. he could not control himself and repeated these words Laa'llaaha il-lal Laahu Ashraf ‘Alee Rasool-ul-Laah and Allaah humma Salli 'A’laa Saiy-yidinah Wa Nabeey-yina Wa Maulana Ashraf ‘Alee You can see it clearly written here…. He himself writes: Though I am awake yet could not resist and obliged as my tongue is not in my control. That whole day I remained engrossed in such thoughts and next day I remained over whelmed with emotions and tears. I have many other matters of love with Maulana, what can I say? The person wrote this in a letter to Maulana Thanvi explaining his dream incident. Thanvi instead of advising him that this is not permissible even in reverence or idolization to utter wrong Kalimaah... and you should ask for forgiveness or forbade him for harboring such reverence, rather he answered that there is consolation and satisfaction in this incident. And the person you are following is a perfect follower of Sunnah, 24 Shawwal 1335 Hijri. Instead of forbidding and scolding the person he writes clearly that there is satisfaction and consolation in the incident. He suggested that taking the name of Thanvi instead the Prophet (Peace be upon him) in Kalimaah and Darood is not a mistake but it is perfectly alright. It shows that Thanvi considers it permissible to take his name instead of the name of the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], in Kalimaah. What is he trying to say…that it is okay to read the Kalimah with the name of Thanvi Sahib.. Then… Check the Deobandism/ Wahabism… preaching [Mazhab] what they are saying???Instead of scolding and forbidding him, or even explaining him with love he clearly tells him that this incident has peace of mind. If someone else wrote and belief in this kind of preaching and writing Deobandi scholars will issue many Fatwas [Religious Verdict] of protest but for their own matter they all [The Deobandi Mazhab ] ignore this and remain silent. It is clearly written by Maulana Thanvi. You can see this reference with the name of Ashraf Alee and Kalimaah with Ashraf Alee’s name. |
REFERENCE #25:
Celebrating Meelaad-un-Nabee, [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] [birthday of the Prophet] is like the Hindus celebrate the birthday of their Kanaihya. [Fataawa Meelaad Shareef, pg 8 and Baraaheen-e-Qaati’ah, pg 148]. Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: We have seen Baraaheen-e-Qaati’ah before, see it again. Which page? Maulana Qari Muhammad Jahangir Naqshbandi: Page148 Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: Page 148 is here, he writes clearly: The Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], is not born every day then why is this birthday celebration? It is just like the birthday celebrations of Kanaihya.. They are simply saying that to celebrate Meelad Shareef by the Muslims is just like the Hindus observe the Birth day of their Kanaihya. Someone should ask them if they don’t want to celebrate the Meelaad why did they use such words and why compare it with the Hindu’s? They should not celebrate Meelaad, if they do not want to they are not bound or force to celebrate. But if someone wants to celebrate Meelaad with love then why are you stopping them from observing. Celebrating Meelaad Shareef is the Sunnah of Allaah Ta'alaa and I have written a Risaalaa "Islaam Ki Pehli Eid" to prove the reason for celebrating Meelaad with references from the scholars of Deoband. Whether it is permissible to celebrate Meelaad ? What would they get who celebrate Meelaad? This book has proofs and references from the books of Deobandi Scholars. We can’t force one to celebrate Meelaad who does not celebrate it but it is not permissible to say like this? Is it not disrespect and insult to say that celebrating Meelaad every day is like celebrating the birthday of Kanaihya … I want to reply to them ...and Question them! Do they not celebrate Shab e Baraa’at? In the last ten days of the month of Ramadan there are 5 Taaq [Night of vigilance, worship, prayers] nights on 21st, 23rd, 25th, 27th & 29st. Don’t they celebrate ‘Layal a tul Qadar / Shab e Qadar’ during Ramadan and usually and popularly people celebrate it on 27th of Ramadan. I want to ask that the greatness of Lailaa tul Qadar is due to the Nazool of Qur’aan [The Deliverance of Qur;aan]. Does Nazool e Qur’aan happen every year? The answer would be no. It happened once on Lailaa tul Qadar but it is blessed for every year and is better than thousand nights. And if the night of Nazool e Qur’aan became blessed for the rest of life then the birthday of the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], also became special day for every year. |
I have presented the reference in my books, I would present original book if it would be required as I am sitting in my library. I have copied Maulana Thanvi’s reference in my book Islaam ki Pehli Eid’s page 23, his small pamphlets are separate from his books as he has written a few books and his followers has presented different chapters of his books in form of small pamphlets.
In one of those pamphlets "Jumaah K Fazaail o Ahkaam", on its page 4 Maulana Thanvi writes with reference to Imaam Ahmad that the night of Jumaah is the preeminent than Laila tuL Qadar, the night between Thursday and Friday. As in Islaamic calendar night comes first and day comes later on the contrary in English calendar day comes first and night later. According to Islaamic belief Friday night is preeminent because the Prophet (Peace be upon him) came in the sacred womb [Shikam] of his mother during this night. Thanvi took this reference from Mishkaat Shareef [The Authentic book of Hadees]. If the night of the Prophet (Peace be upon him)’s coming as fetus in the womb is so Important and magnificent then how high would be the status of the day when the Prophet (Peace be upon him) came into the world. And here he is comparing and saying that Meelaad is like celebrating the birthday of Kanaihya. They are discarding the magnificence of the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], as they were the agents of the English who were in favors of the Hindus. No Muslim will like to use such words for his Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], we celebrate the Meelaad un Nabee in a way as no one else celebrates in the world and we don’t follow Hindus in Meelaad. We celebrate this day with Ieemaan and we have nothing to do with the [Mushrik] Hindus. |
REFERENCE #26:
Maulana Qari Muhammad Jahangir Naqshbandi: The holy Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] and the Daj-jaal both are originally blessed with life. The traits which characterize the holy Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] are also shared by the Daj-jaal. (Aabe Hayaat, pg l69) Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani: This is an old book even some part of it is decayed, 1936 published 1355, Matbaa Qadeemi Delhi written by Qasim Nanotwi. Its first page is damaged and I have joined it with some other page. See here written that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) shares his qualities with Daj-jaal. Our scholars have given satisfactory answer to this. Those who want to see its answer can see Allamah Saiyyid Ahmad Saeed Kazmi’s answer to this, the name of his book is "Al Haq ul Mubeen." I have shown the reference of the real book that the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], shares the qualities with Daj-jaal. Maulana Qari Muhammad Jahangir Naqshbandi: |
REFERENCE #27:
Nothing happens on the wish of the Prophet (Peace be upon him). Reference Book Taqwiyatul leemaan,, page 56. Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani: I am sorry to say that Taqwiyatul leemaan, is the book that is being distributed all over the world though it has almost more than 70 Kalimaat e Kufr.[Statements of Infidelity] I have seen myself that Haajis are being distributed this book free of cost in Makkah Al Mukaramaah and Madinah Tul Munawaraa. You have already witnessed some of its references. Now in this reference they write: Nothing can happen on the wish of the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], it is clearly written on page 56. You can behold it. Just imagine the status of the Prophet (Peace be upon him) among HIS creations and he is saying here that nothing happens on the wishes of the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], No Believer can accept this thing but they have written it clearly. In its response they write that Allaah Ta'alaa wishes same like Maulana Thanvi, I present this reference too to present the both sides of the view. See this book "Hakeem ul Ummat" by Abdul Majeed Daryabadi, published in Lahore. He writes on its page 47: Allaah Ta'alaa wished what HIS favorite human being wished. Daryabadi is writing about Thanvi and in Taqwiyatul leemaan it is written that nothing can happen on the wishes of the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],. Just imagine that they have great value for Deobandi Scholars but have no respect for the Prophet (Peace be upon him). |
Maulana Qari Muhammad Jahangir Naqshbandi:
REFERENCE #28: Believe in Allaah alone, and do not believe in anyone except Him. (Taqwiyatul Ieemaan, pg 14) Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani: This is the reference of the same book "Taqwiyatul leemaan," behold it is very clearly written that believe in no one except Allaah Ta'alaa. Every Prophet brought the message to believe no one except Allaah Ta'alaa. If you don’t believe in Prophets then how can you claim to believe Allaah, it is beyond my understanding, because the Prophet's say that they are Allaah Ta'alaa’s creation and Allaah Ta'alaa sends HIS revelations to them. Until and unless one cannot believe in Risaalat, one cannot believe in Allaah Ta'alaa as we identify Allaah Ta'alaa through the Prophet (Peace be upon him) and before him other Ambiyaa helped to identify Allaah Ta'alaa. They say that believe only in Allaah Ta'alaa and no one else and they have written this sentence in the book for several times… you can see it. |
REFERENCE #29:
Before Allaah Ta'alaa all the Ambiyaa and Auliyaa are inferior like an insignificant dust worthless speck. Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani: Perhaps I have mentioned this reference before, they have written that the Prophets and Ambiyaa are inferior and insignificant like a speck; you can see it again on page 54 that I have explained earlier and showing again. Maulana Qari Muhammad Jahangir Naqshbandi: |
REFERENCE #30:
It is permissible to call Nabee the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], your brother... book “Baraaheen-e-Qaati'ah”, and page 3. Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani: This book “Baraaheen-e-Qaati'ah” I have shown you before for some references. Review it once again, it is written by Khaleel Anbethwi and Published By: Muhammad Ishaaq Maalik Kutb khana Rahimia Saharanpur in 1365 AH, If anyone calls the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], brother for being descendant of Hazrat Aadam [Alaiehis Salaam] then he said nothing against Qur’aan and Hadees because we are all the descendants of Aadam [Alaiehis Salaam]. It means that the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], is the descendant of Hazrat Aadam like we are the descendants of Hazrat Aadam[Alaiehis Salaam]. .. and it is permissible to call him brother for this reason then it is not against Qur’aan and Hadees. According to this rule in my view it would be fine to say on this basis that Khalil Anbethwi, the writer is the brother of Namrood. If he is called the brother of Namrood then he should not mind. Pharaoh [Firaoun] is also descendant of Aadam and Deobandi Scholars are also Banee Aadam then they should call Abu Jahal, Yazeed, Shimr, Ibn e Ziad and Waleed Bin Mughera their brother. Why do they call Nabee their brother only. We believe in all the verses of Qur’aan by Allaah Kareem for the respect of Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], as Qur’aan advises us to respect him. He is the superior being and his wives are “Ummat e Mumineen” and the Nabee is our spiritual father and we cannot call him our brother. And I want to ask that Hazrat Alee [Allaah have mercy on him] and Hazrat Abbas [Allaah have mercy on him] were the cousins of the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], but they never called him brother. There is one Hadees that tells us that the cousin of the Prophet (Peace be Upon Him) once stayed with him to see how he prays [worship] during the night. He was standing behind the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], and Nabee [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] ask him to stand next to him twice... but he stepped back to stand behind each time. After the Nawafil Payers the Prophet (Peace be upon him) asked him why he stepped behind every time he said he wanted him to stand next to me. Hazrat Abbas [Allaah have mercy on him] answered that although you are my cousin brother but you are also the Prophet of Allaah Kareem and I can’t stand with you out of respect My question is that the one who is real relatives respecting him a lot and the ones who are not justified to call him brother are calling him brother. If we have to call him brother on the basis of Qur’aan and Hadees then it is also not correct. |
The one who believes Nabee and Wali are human being and God’s creation even then go to them for reference, help and presents them offerings despite being Muslim is equal to Abu Jahal in Kufr. Reference Book “Taqwiyatul leemaan,” page 7 & 27.
Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani: This book “Taqwiyatul leemaan,,” by Ismail Dehlvi is again under consideration. In this book he clearly explains that Allaah Almighty has not given powers to anyone to involve in the affairs of universe, here by word “Tasaraf” he means to change or affect someone spiritually. Leaving it aside I answer to it shortly. I have the book “Aap beeti” in two volumes. It is an autobiography of a Muhammad Zakria Hayat written by him. He was the leader of Tableeghi Jamaa’at and the book is published by Maktaba Shaeikh Zakria, Mufti street Saharanpur. See it’s inside title page, this is its first volume and it contains a full chapter with the name of “Tasarufaat.” If there are no tasarufaat.” then why did he write a full chapter on this topic? This is not the only example, look at this book “Tazkratul Rasheed” by Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi whom they call “Mutaa ul Qul” and “Mutaa ul Aalim” means he is the leader of all. This is the inside title see it, even in this they have written a complete chapter on Tasarufaat.” if tasarfat are not authorized then why they have given these topics. See here is a complete chapter on Tasarufaat.” with the name of Tazkiyaa o Taasarfat and there they have written that no one is authorized for Tasarufaat.”, then see there is a heading of “Incidents of Tasarufaat.”.” Even in this book it is written that after the death of Gangohi his Tasarufaat.” are still active in the world. For further details, see page 151 of Volume II of this book: He has gone from this world but his Tasarufaat.” are still active in the world. Their leader Ismail Dehlvi said there that no one is authorized for Tasarufaat.” and here he says here and there about Tasarufaat.” I want to show you another reference from this book. Imagine if there Tasarufaat.” are still active in the world what would be the range of Tasarufaat.” of Ambiyaa and Auliyaa. See: How long we explain the inner Tasarufaat.” of Imaam e Rabbani. It is mentioned everywhere in this book that he provides comforts for hardships and provide needs. It is fact that that there is no one to solve your problems and cater needs except Allaah Almighty and they say that he provides relief in all troubles and cater all needs. Just imagine he is called Mushkil Kushaa and Hajit Rawa. Moreover he writes that what Tasarufaat.” of Hazrat did after Baie’t [oath] are beyond expression. He further writes on page 140 that inner Tasarufaat of Imaam e Rabbani appeared so forcefully that one cannot imagine its access. Means we cannot know its boundaries. Their leader Ismail Dehlvi didn’t accept anyone else Tasarufaat and explain the Tasarufaat” of their Imaam everywhere. Check here they write that Tasarufaat over disbelievers is given to this sacred group only. He wrote that no one has Tasaruf and he is writing here that it is given to everyone. It is his general Tasaruf and after developing affection and being follower of him how his Tasarufaat would benefit them is unimaginable. So everywhere Tsarufaat are mentioned. Here they have defined Tasaruf too that it means that physical strength has Tasaruf over concrete bodies. On page 136 there is a chapter named “Tazkiyaa Tasarufaat” and their leaders deny Tsarufaat.” (Please open Tsarufaat.” topic from this book.) God has not empowered anyone with Tasarufaat.” in this world and I have shown you that they have mentioned the Tasarufaat.” of Deobandi Scholars all over. They write clearly that if anyone asks for help from any human being and present him offerings then he is equivalent with Abu Jahal in Kufr. Means if anyone present offering in the name of Ghaus e Paak and Khawaja Ghareeb Nawaz even then he is like Abu Jahal in Kufr. Just ponder that this person has presented all the Muslims like Kafir. You can see the words yourself that he is equal to Abu Jahal in Kufr, presenting offerings and making them a reference… If what he has said is right then why Allaah Al Kareem has created Auliyaa’s and Ambiyas. You can see these words. Why Allaah Almighty has asked to seek some resource in the Qur’aan e Pak. In Qur’aan all over is written about the Shafaa’at of the Prophet (Peace be upon him) and here it is written that no human being can be a reference for Shafaa’at. He opines that to believe that Ambiya and Auliyaa are not like God but human beings created by Allaah Almighty and Allaah Al Kareem has given them the right of Shafaa’at is not Kufr. He has not given any difference between Kaafir and Muslims. What can be said to the person who believes this? He has not given any difference between Kaafir and believers…. Even has repeated this time and again throughout the book and in the two pages 7 & 27 that I previously referred: ‘The one who considers anyone able of Tasaruf or even considers him his wakeel, it is only Shirk no matter doesn’t take him like Allaah Almighty.’ Then all the Tsarufaat.” have been proved should be admitted as shirk because they accept the Tasaruf of their Ulaama’s but don’t accept the Tsarufaat of Ambiya. According to their Ulaama they are not Muslims. The thing I want to explain is their double standard, one for themselves and the other for belief and practices. I have shown you complete reference in this book. Yes… Here we have a full chapter on Tasarufaat in this book. Here we have 970 and 971 pages they have explained on page 971 the Tasarfaat of their Gangohi in this autobiography about the Azaab e Qabr that was taken off. The topic is ‘AQaber K Tsarufaat’ it is the autobiography no 6 page 966 written by Shaiekh Muhammad Muhammad Zakria, the great leader of Tableeghi Jamaa’at whom they call Shaiekh Al Hadees. Their other great leader Ismail Dehlvi says that the one who proves Tasarufaat is Mushrik and if so then they should call Shaiekh Muhammad Zakria, Thanvi and Gangohi a Mushrik also if they say No! Then they should admit openly that what he wrote is wrong and was on false belief. |
Durood Taaj is disfavored and reciting it is not permitted. (Fazaa'il-i-Durood Shareef, pg 68-69 and Tazkiratur Rasheed vol. 2, pg 117).
Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani: I say two things with this regard that ‘Fazaa'il e Aamaal with me is published by Maktaba Aarifeen in Karachi previously named as Tableegh e Nisaab. Moreover, I tell you that I have the old version and in the new version they have omitted discarded the chapter of Darood Shareef. I have with me the older version of this book.The one that is available in the market right now does not have this chapter in the book. The new version of this book ‘Fazaa'il e Amal’ has no portion on Darood Shareef, they have discarded this chapter totally….Why! It is written…..Although God [Allaah Ta'alaa] has made them write with their own pen As Salat o Was Salaam Ya Nabee Allaah, As Salaat o Was Salaam Ya Rasool Allaah,….They have separated it now it is available in new book form both in Urdu and English versions.Here I have with me the older version In it there is the third Chapter where he talks about the Hadees which warn for the punishment for not reciting Darood Shareef. He writes clearly that Darood e Taj and Darood e Lakhi etc which were written by others were not liked by him meaning Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi Saahib. This Darood Taj was recited by Hazrat Abu Al Hassan Shazli in front of the Holy Prophet [Peace be upon him] and Allamah Ahmed Saeed Kazmi has written a book on Darood e Taj and he is saying that it was not liked by Gangohi Saahib…. Though the Holy Prophet (Peace be upon him) liked it and should not be recited because Gangohi disliked it. This is not a proper way and I am presenting his words. Same words I read in Tazkra tur Rasheediyah, on pages 117 & 280 0n both places it is written and I will show them too: He (Gangohi) disliked Darood e Taj and and Darood e Lakhi were not likely favored by him for being written by others and he considered them against the Shariah. Same is written in Tazkra tur Rasheediyah Volume II that Darood e Taj and Darood Lakhi were not liked by Gangohi so should not be recited. You can imagine their Haal [Spritual Condition] and personality who dislikes and disfavored the reading of Darood Shareef and forbid to recite them. Next reference please… |
REFERENCE #33:
A saintly person of the Deobandi faction [Saiyyid Ahmad of Raae Bareilly] had been given a bath by Hazrat 'Alee [Radiyal Laahu 'Anhu] and Hazrat Faatimah [Radiyal Laahu 'Anha] had put on clothes on his [naked] body. [Siraat-i-Mustaqeem, Persian pg 164, Urdu pg 280]. Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani: This is the book Siraat e Mustaqeem from which I have presented a reference before that how wrong it is to think about the Holy Prophet [Peace be upon him] while saying prayers. I present page 164 in Persian and 280 in Urdu. You would like to know about whom this is said… it is said about Ismail Ahmed Bareilvi whom they call Shaheed of Balaakot. Just imagine how insolent and disrespectfull it is to say such thing about Hazrat Faatimah [Radiyal Laahu 'Anha] and Hazrat 'Alee [Radiyal Laahu 'Anhu]. This is Persian text and on page 280 I present its Urdu translation in their own words, I have presented this book before now see it here…. One day saw Wallayat Maab Hazrat 'Alee [Radiyal Laahu 'Anhu] and Saiyyidah tun Nisaa Hazrat Faatimah [Radiyal Laahu 'Anha] in the dream. Hazrat 'Alee [Radiyal Laahu 'Anhu] bathed him with his own hands and massaged well his body with his own hands to clean it thoroughly, just like parents take care of their kids. Then Hazrat Faatimah [Radiyal Laahu 'Anha] dressed him with nice and delicate an expensive dress. Just note that he was nude and Hazrat 'Alee [Radiyal Laahu 'Anhu] bathed and Hazrat Faatimah [Radiyal Laahu 'Anha] dressed him. God forbid!!Of such insolence that only could be done by them. It’s all written in clear words, are they respecting them? Then why do they dislike Mirza Qadiani who said that once Hazrat Faatimah [Radiyal Laahu 'Anha] came and put his head on his thigh… God forbid, this way there is no difference between them and Mirza Qaidiyaani. Imagine how insolent they are? You can check the text in book Siraat e Mustaqeem on page 164 in Persian and for Urdu text check page 280. |
All the Meelaad Shareef, Mi'raaj Shareef, Giyaarhveen Shareef, 'Urs Shareef, Khatm Shareef, Soyem, Chehlum, Faatihah Khawani, and leesaal-e-Sawaab, are all unlawful and bad innovations and the ways of the infidels and Hindus. (Fataawa Ashrafiyah, vol 2, Page 58, Fataawa Rasheediyah, vol 2, pages 144 and 150, and vol 3, pg 93 and 94).
Alamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: Volume? Maulana Qari Muhammad Jahangir Naqshbandi: Page 150 Volume II, page 144, 93, 94 Volume III. Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: This is “Fataawa Rasheediyah,” Volume III, I have shown you its other two volumes previously. It is published in 1391 at Kutb Khana Raheemia, Sunehri Masjid Delhi. Fataawaa of Rasheed Ahmed Gangohi is in three volumes. What is the page no? of volume III? Maulana Qari Muhammad Jahangir Naqshbandi: In volume II? Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani: In volume III? Maulana Qari Muhammad Jahangir Naqshbandi: 93 & 94. Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi: Behold… Just notice, they say: Just imagine what they are saying!!! Somebody asked the question is it permissible or not to partake in some Urs Shareef where only the Holy Qur’aan is recited and sweets are distributed? And the answer given is that it is not right to partake any Urs or Meelaad Shareef and attending of Urs and Meelaad Shareef is not correct; Answer by …Rasheed Ahmed Gangohi. Then I would like to know how the centenary celebration of Dar ul Uloom Deoband is right? How is the death anniversary of Muftis correct? There is no mufti whose death anniversary is not celebrated.In the Jhang Newspaper.. on 10th April an advertisement was published to celebrate death anniversary of Maulana Ehtsham ul Haq Thanvi and I have that newspaper too but don’t have with me right now otherwise I would like to present it too for reference. Now Meelaad and death anniversaries are being celebrated although they say in their preaching and writing through and through that it is not correct thing to do. It is beyond understanding whether their belief [Aqeedah] is true or their practices [Amal]. They totally contradict what thay Preaches …. Here they have written many things at several places about month of Rajab, reciting Faatihah and burial etc etc. Other than this in “Fataawa Rasheediyah,” volume II those references are present. Even they have written to the extent that visiting graves on the day of Urs is haraam, despite this they have denied this on many places. Meelaad o Faatihah page 150, behold the title again “Fataawa Rasheediyah,” volume II. It can be seen in Taleefaat e Rasheediyah again that is published newly, I will later explain my purpose for presenting the older version. See here written that reciting the Holy Qur’aan, Kalimaah on graves and Soyem are not permissible in any case. Some, Teejaah and Faatihah on Sheerini are called Bidat e Zallalaa here. Meelaad is not at all permissible, means Teejaah or Daswaan are not recommended though these are just names of the days when the prayer is held for the deceased person. They are not allowing any of those calling them Bidaat e Zallalaa or unfair. Bidaat e Zallalaa means something new that would lead one astray. Even at places they write these things haraam and something else. Strange thing is they are doing these things and eat all those things too. I want to ask from them and tell you as well that they are forbidding it now and then and doing it too. Don’t know whether their actions are right or sayings?? If its haraam then why do they eat haraam. It should be noted that the Deobandi-Wahaabi-Tableeghi people who declare that celebrating Meelaad [birth] of the holy Prophet [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam] as a wrong, unlawful and forbidden act of apostasy, must be questioned how is it permissible and right to celebrate the foundation-day of the Daarul 'Uloom, Deoband, and to call upon an apostate women to inaugurate it, to celebrate the days and the death anniversaries of their Mullaas and their Muftees, to appoint the time, the date and the place of such gatherings, to hold political and non-political demonstrations, to establish institutions in the name of non-Allaah, to ask for financial and other kinds of help for the propagation of non-Allaah how can this be correct and prohibited? |
To eat a well known indigenous crow is a rewarding act. (Fataawa Rasheediyah, Vol 2, pg, 130). (But the eating of halwaah (a sweet dish) distributed on the occasion of Shab-e-Baraa’at is forbidden). |
Fataawa Rasheediyah,Page-130 Volume-II, Author Rasheed Gangohi
It is clearly written on the above mentioned page that someone asked that ZAAGH MAROOFA (Zaagh means crow); if at some place majority did not eat crow and hates the one who eats it, if one eats crow will he either get some reward or neither reward nor torment? Answer given on the page is, “He will get reward for eating crow”. They term sweet of Shab-e-Baraa’at as Haram and filthy but declaring reward over eating the meat of the crow. Those who term pure sweet of Shab-e-Baraat as Haraam than they should have such food to eat like crows. One knows that whatever one eats had effect on him. Alhmadu lil laah (by the grace of Allaah ﷻ ) we Ahle- Sunnat Wa Jamaa’at eat sweets, food etc. whose reward has been presented before Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, scholars and elders of Islaam; we eat such pure food so we recite Naats of Prophet ﷺ and speak sweet, when they will eat crows then they will talk what you have read now. |
To call upon the friends of Allaah even though regarding them as His creations is infidelity. (Taqwiyatul Ieemaan, 7). (But it is not forbidden if the ‘Ulama of Deoband themselves invoke them).
Allamah Kaukab Noorani Okarvi I have just presented this book before… It is clearly written that even if one thinks other human being as creature of Allaah ﷻeven yet it is Shirk to consider someone as Wakeel (helper), intercessor even the saints of Almighty Allaahﷻ as well. Before this he has written that Allaah Kareems’s apostles and saints do not have powers and now he is writing that keeping any relation or seeking help from them even considering them as creature of Allaah [Ta’aalaa]ﷻ for seeking help is Shirk. |
To supplicate after funeral prayers is not permitted. (Fatwa of Muftee Jameel Ahmad Thanvi, Jaami’ah Ashrafiyah, Lahore). (But it is not forbidden if the 'Ulama of Deoband themselves supplicate).
|
Praying Funeral Prayer is not allowed
This was a one-page poster by Mufti Jameel Ahmed Thanvi, who was in Jamiaah Ashrafia Lahore, I had preserved it somewhere. In this poster, he has written that Praying after funeral prayer is not allowed. But the people of their sect, Abdul Qaadir Azaad, Imaam of Shaahi Mosque despite of calling himself Hanafi, he led the absentia funeral prayer of General Muhammad Zia ul Haq, President of Pakistan and also prayed after completing the funeral prayer. The funeral prayer of Zia ul Haq was offered in Islamabad led by a Deobandi Cleric as well and he also prayed after funeral prayer. They themselves write that it is not allowed but do same thing themselves. They are also enemies of the dead, as we should pray for the forgiveness of dead, everyone prays in each prayer, “O Allaah forgive our parents and Muslims”. However, their situation is that they are enemies of even dead and do not like to pray for dead as well. |
It is permitted to take parshaad (the remnants of food presented to and idol) on the occasion of the Hindu festivals of Holi and Deewaali. (Fataawa Rasheediyah, vol 2, pg 130). (But to take food distributed on the occasion of Faatihah and Niyaaz is prohibited.)
|
Question: If Hindu send Prasad (food) of their Holi or Diwaali to their master, teacher or servant, is this allowed to a Muslim Master, Teacher or Servant?
Answer: It is allowed to eat the food from Hindus for their festivals. Rasheed Ahmed Gangohi has written that it is allowed; he is the same person who has declared food / sweets distributed on Shab-e-Baraa’at, Meelaad Shareef, Urs as Haraam and not allowed but terming Prasad of Hindus as allowed to eat. This proves that to whom he belongs, they used to live with Hindus and had links with them thus everything of Hindus is allowed but all the things from Almighty Allaahﷻ, His Prophet ﷺ and saints is not allowed. It is clearly written that it is allowed, meaning that Muslim should eat food of Hindus Prasad but not the food that is being distributed for reward of Muslims who have passed away. |
There is no harm in eating food, if clean, prepared at the houses of cobblers and sweepers. (Fataawa Rasheediyah, Vol 2, pg130). (But clean and lawful permitted food distributed on the occasion of niyaaz of Giyaarhveen Shareef is altogether prohibited.)
It is clearly written that eating from the Churha Chamaar ( Cobbler) is allowed. Meaning eating the food of Meelaad, Giyaaween Shareef, Urs etc. is not allowed although it is clean and from a Muslim but eating from the Churhaa Chamaar (non-Muslim / Shudra) is allowed. |
Drinking water from the sabeel (kiosk) set up by Hindus (apostates) out of the money earned through interest is permitted. (Fataawa Rasheediyah, Vol 3, pg 113 and 114). (But drinking clean water from the sabeel set up during the month of Muharram for the leesaal-e-Sawaab of Saiyyidina Imaam Husaien (Radiyal Laahu 'Anhu) with money provided by the lawful earnings of Muslims is
prohibited.) • (Ma’aazal Laah summa Ma’aazal’ Laah) |